|
Martha Albertson Fineman is the newest Woodruff
Professor, the highest honor Emory can bestow on a faculty member.
An internationally recognized law and society scholar, Fineman is
a leading authority on family law and feminist jurisprudence. Following
graduation from University of Chicago Law School, Fineman clerked
for the Hon. Luther M. Swygert of the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit, and then taught at University of Wisconsin
and Columbia University. She joined Cornell Law School in 1999 to
become the first endowed Chair in the nation in Feminist Jurisprudence.
Her scholarly interest is in the legal regulation of intimacy. Fineman
is founder and director of the Feminism
and Legal Theory Project, which was inaugurated in 1984. Fineman's
publications include The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency,
The New Press (2003); "Taking Children's Interest Seriously,"
Nomos; "Why Marriage?" University of Virginia Journal
of Law and Social Policy (2001); The Neutered Mother, and The Sexual
Family and other Twentieth Century Tragedies, Routledge Press (1995).
She has received awards for her writing and teaching and has served
on several government study commissions. She teaches family law,
feminist jurisprudence, law and sexuality, and seminars on reproductive
issues and select topics in feminist legal theory.
Research interests: women, sexuality, gender, children,
vulnerable populations, social goods, law, law reform
Human rights courses: LAW 836 – Reproductive Issues:
offered every two years, fall semester; LAW 681 – Sexuality
and the Law: offered every two years, fall semester.
Publications related to human rights:
Mothers in Law: Feminism and the Legal Regulation
of Motherhood, Columbia University Press (1995)
The Public Nature of Private Violence, Routledge
Press (1994)
“Why Marriage” In For and Against Marriage:
Strategies to Critique, Defend, Reform, and Apprise a Venerable
Legal Category, edited by Anita Bernstein (forthcoming, New York
University Press 2005)
“Equality Across Legal Cultures: The Role
of International Human Rights,” 21 Thomas Jefferson Law Review
1 (2005).
“A Legal (and Otherwise) Realist Response
to “Sex as Contract” 4 Columbia Journal of Gender and
Law 128 (1994).
|
|